The demanding of knowing the status quo urges modern people to follow the media since the reports made by often highlights the importance of globalized recognition. But if we take a close look into them, often are the news negative. As a personal consideration, the media does need to follow more good news.
First, frequent bad news makes people reading them, along with the society nervous. Some disasters should be reported, because they warn the public to care problems. This is somehow vital, when the example is taken from things like a gun shooting or drug abusing. Medias reporting these draws close attention from the related authority, sometimes to change the trend as a result. That is just not always the case. Very often there is the conflict aroused afterwards, and people start to argue endlessly on it. In short, things never change or change for a short time then retreat, if the focus is mainly on bad news.
Oppositely, reporting more news would directly strike into the heartstring of the crowd. People are actually easy to be led according to the history. Feed them with more beautiful stories, and they simply believe the existence of harmony. In many countries on planet, this is what the government, often not a democratic one does. People, as a whole shall they be called the human race, does not care about truth. The crowd want unity, peace, and happiness, maybe wealthy life, respect, or self-confidence. Good news fulfills all the things listed above, and will promote society, elevate souls, then refine humanism.
In conclusion, both considering the benefits by reporting more good news, and the bad part brought by bad ones, the answer is that the press shall try to put priority on making the right choice.